3aea9 d8s2d ibzhh 34722 et4ab 8te88 3z86z 89trz z33h9 9836z k9eda fbtn9 sbyr8 ek734 tishy rfsda bsahy ar2y5 za7fr 6n54b thnat Dis a bop |

Dis a bop

2022.01.26 17:22 AdFlimsy6156 Dis a bop

submitted by AdFlimsy6156 to therock [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 Fireworkwizard Ordered a new pc, smashed corner upon arrival.


https://preview.redd.it/z423a1xhc3e81.jpg?width=3008&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9648c274fe1412f486a376b97bf276cf8e243611
https://preview.redd.it/l6ksn0xhc3e81.jpg?width=3008&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b0c28af367479bd39e5ebd875058284caf2baa0c
https://preview.redd.it/4lnvbwwhc3e81.jpg?width=4096&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5d5bfcc7a839df5a3391417308728d1af51eddba
submitted by Fireworkwizard to NZXT [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 dirrtyremixes Top Tracks [26-Jan-2022]

submitted by dirrtyremixes to beatportmp3 [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 dudeness1974 It seems to be fading again - could this be "freedom"?

So I have had a couple of times where I have felt the limerence wearing off but I am starting to feel like it might be real this time.
It's really nothing that my LO has done, and we even have plans to meet at the end of the week, but I just don't feel the same concern about what's going on with her. I have actually had several hours during the day each where she barely enters my mind at all.
I can't say the reason for this but it seems to be a combination of me really focusing on some other key aspects of my own personal development which makes my concern for her seem a bit "trite" And the fact that I am just kind of tired of putting so much energy, and time, into worrying about someone else's every move and how it relates to me. I think ultimately things are going to pan out the way they pan out.
Who knows? Maybe I will be on here again in a few days freaking out about something, back in full limerence, but I don't see that happening give my current mindset.
submitted by dudeness1974 to limerence [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 TSKRM Danielle Shay

Danielle Shay submitted by TSKRM to hot_reporters [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 Vincentoddson123 [HIRING] Couples photo (under $50 USD)

I'm hoping someone will be able to recreate this photo, I would like the male's arm to be around the woman instead of holding up the phone and a different background. (I don't care what of, just not a bathroom).
It's a valentine's day gift so some lovey-dovey stuff would be cute.
I'm willing to pay for a rough sketch before the final product, but if I like your art on your page I probably won't ask for it.

[first post on the forum so if i messed up somewhere myb)
submitted by Vincentoddson123 to HungryArtists [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 No-Bee761 Twelfth monotype run, this time mono Ghost

Twelfth monotype run, this time mono Ghost submitted by No-Bee761 to pokemonradicalred [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 frankie929 Introductory Beat Tape

Introductory Beat Tape submitted by frankie929 to beats [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 Forgotten_Kingdom282 Jotaro and Star Platinum Fanart - By Me :)

Jotaro and Star Platinum Fanart - By Me :) submitted by Forgotten_Kingdom282 to StardustCrusaders [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 mr_wick200 Don't know where to begin to study

Hello it's my first time doing the SAT, and my upcoming is in March 12th, I need to achieve a score of 530+ in the math section to be eligible for a scholarship to study abroad. Is that possible to do when it's almost in a month and a half? There are just too many sources and I don't know where to begin, I tried to sign up for a course after doing their assessment and getting feedback but it's too expensive. I just want one that is straightforward and to help me achieve that score in less time with good strategies and tricks.
submitted by mr_wick200 to Sat [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 miolmok Turns out cracking your joints isn't bad for you. It may even serve a useful purpose

Turns out cracking your joints isn't bad for you. It may even serve a useful purpose submitted by miolmok to Health [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 punnotfound Thanks, I hate massive Jesus

Thanks, I hate massive Jesus submitted by punnotfound to TIHI [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 Jmariner360 Nom nom nom. Happy hump day everyone! Have a great one!

Nom nom nom. Happy hump day everyone! Have a great one! submitted by Jmariner360 to KitchenConfidential [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 beleebi8211 Win 4 Lift Tickets to Stratton Mountain Resort (2/11/2022){US}

Win 4 Lift Tickets to Stratton Mountain Resort (2/11/2022){US} submitted by beleebi8211 to giveaways [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 ralphoas999 Some oxy JUICE

Some oxy JUICE submitted by ralphoas999 to LeanDE [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 Epsciks LOOKING FOR SOLANA NFT MARKETER

Looking for NFT Marketing managers, ready to build hype in server and Twitter, you will receive a % of the Mint, and be paid depending on your contributions.
submitted by Epsciks to NFT [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 Aggressive_Toe_2145 Асен Василев: 585 млн. евро са предвидени за развитие на Северна България

submitted by Aggressive_Toe_2145 to bulgaria [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 desireablechaos We need a villager based on this little guy

We need a villager based on this little guy submitted by desireablechaos to AnimalCrossing [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 Cynophilis (TSXV: PLUR) (OTCQB: PLCKF) "Plurilock's CEO to Speak on Cybersecurity at 2022 World Outlook Financial Conference.

Ian L. Paterson, CEO of Plurilock will speak at the conference on the Company's cutting-edge zero trust technology and the future of cybersecurity." Thinking the stock should catch some traction at this conference.
The conference provides Canadian investors with access to independent market analysts and insight from Canadian financial and technology leaders and will give Plurilock a large audience of investors to reach and provide light on their company as an investment opportunity.
https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/111657
submitted by Cynophilis to Canadapennystocks [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 williamfrantz The Difference Between Minarchy and Anarcho-Capitalism

[I posted this as a comment in another thread 2 years back but I think it deserves its own post.]
As a MinArc embroiled in lengthy debates with several AnCaps, some key differences have become clear to me, but I readily admit up front that these observations are highly controversial and merely my humble opinion. Let's start with some of the common objections that AnCaps raise to MinArcs...
If the MinArc adopts 100% voluntary funding for government then you immediately eliminate the "taxes are theft" talking point. An AnCap cannot call the MinArc state a "coercive organization" due to taxation. A MinArc state can theoretically be achieved with zero "theft". Nobody is forced to fund the government.
If the MinArc adopts liberal immigration policies with unfettered travel then you eliminate the "no choice" talking point. An AnCap cannot call the MinArc state coercive due to lack of choice. If you like the government of Springfield, then go to Springfield. If you'd rather have the government of Shelbyville then go to Shelbyville. Nobody is forced to accept any particular government or service.
If the MinArc establishes the jurisdiction by peaceful acquisition of the land then you eliminate the "forced to join" talking point. An AnCap cannot call the MinArc coercive due to seizure of land. MinArcs can theoretically acquire all the land in the jurisdiction by legitimate means. They simply form an organization and start buying land. Nobody is forced to join nor is the organization forced to accept every applicant.
At this point, some AnCaps (like Murray Rothbard) would argue that such an organization is not "a state". They define government as an organization which uses coercive force. If it's not coercive then it's not government. However, this is begging the question and we shouldn't allow anyone to redefine terms in this fashion. Rothbard does not get to define "government". These words have well established meanings in common vernacular as well as formal definitions. We have a dictionary. Reshuffling language to suit a political ideology is double-plus-un-good.
Disneyland has a government. Disney is the sole provider of all services within Disneyland. They have a regional monopoly on the use of force. They are funded by fees paid voluntarily by visitors who choose to enter Disney's jurisdiction. They have laws enforced by officers. They have voters (shareholders) who collectively own the land and (presumably) acquired it by peaceful, legitimate means. Whether you are a voter or just a visitor, you voluntarily consent to obey Disney laws the moment you step foot in Disneyland. Your presence is your consent. It's a social contract, not an explicit contract. When parents take children into the park, they are providing consent on behalf of the kids. If a baby is born in Disneyland (I'm sure it's happened), the child's parents have provided consent.
A Home Owners Association has a government. The HOA has sole discretion over all services on their land. They have a monopoly on force. They are funded by dues paid voluntarily by the residents who decide to live there. The have laws (and some have officers). They have voters. There's no admission fee for visitors, but all visitors nonetheless voluntarily consent to obey all HOA laws the moment they enter the area. Their presence is their consent whether they are a voter or not.
Both MinArcs and AnCaps are generally fine with such organizations even if the AnCap won't call them "government". Regardless, both are willing to pay for the services being provided. Both are willing to follow the rules while in those areas whether they are one of the voters or not. Neither expects to sign a written consent form as they enter.
The difference is, a MinArc calls that "government" and thinks such communities are a great place to live while an AnCap does not. Of course, a MinArc still wants multiple governments to choose from but a MinArc will physically go to the government of their choice. If you don't like the services provided by your HOA you have to move to a different HOA. You cannot remain in place and choose a different HOA. That's not an option.
AnCaps want a choice of governments without moving. IMHO, that's the most significant difference and perhaps my most controversial conclusion. The AnCap would rather have multiple service providers operating within the same jurisdiction. They want to "unbundle" the services as much as possible. They might buy protection and justice from two different providers. They want explicit contracts, not implied consent (social contracts). As a MinArc, I just think this is a terrible idea. It's not that I think such an arrangement is immoral or impossible, I just think it's a terrible idea. I wouldn't want to live like that. It seems much more efficient to bundle services into a regional monopoly where "your presence is your consent" versus explicitly contracting with each individual and having no idea who is subject to what where.
In fact, my theory is that if we could shake society like an etch-a-sketch and everyone could freely buy services from any provider anywhere, the providers would quickly evolve into regional jurisdictions (like HOAs) anyway. When you bought land, it would come contractually tied to a single service provider. It would be essentially impossible to buy land without a provider. It's just cheaper and easier to operate like that. Service providers in a shared jurisdiction with explicit contracts would go bankrupt. We'd soon be right back to where we are today; if you like the government of Springfield then go to Springfield, otherwise don't go there.
IMHO this structure is pretty much what we have in the US. Setting aside for a moment that the size of government is currently too big for my tastes and that the land was mostly acquired through violent conquest, the basic structure of what we have today is exactly what I want. For example, individuals can "buy" real estate within the jurisdiction of the US but individuals can't literally buy real estate from the US.
Ever since the 14th Amendment, the people of the US have held eminent domain over all land of the US. When you buy a deed what you are buying is a limited set of rights to a parcel of land. You aren't literally buying land. You can't stand in your backyard and secede from the nation anymore than you can stand in your condo and secede from the HOA. The land is inextricably tied to the regional monopoly known as the US Government. To be clear, it's not owned by the government. The land is owned by the citizens. The government is just some set of administrators the people have selected. It's much like homeowners electing an HOA board but the land still belongs to the homeowners collectively and jointly. It's always and forever joint property. None of the land is literally for sale to any individual.
In fact this is true in every(?) nation on Earth. All of them are more like giant HOAs rather than a collection of individual land owners in some kind of "mutual defense" agreement. The fact is, the land always belongs collectively to the public and never to any individuals. "Owning" a deed is more like leasing a parcel of land than purchasing it. For example, if you stop paying your taxes, your land will be repossessed and "sold" at public auction. In other words, there are lots of strings attached to "your" land but you knew that when you bought it.
IMHO, it would be much more honest if we just called it a "land lease" instead of a "land purchase". "Property taxes" should be called "land rent". Functionally it would be no different than what we've currently got today but it would be more honest. This is basically what the Georgists have been saying for decades and IMHO they aren't wrong on this point.
At the same time, I recognize that on a macro level, we live in an AnCap world. There is no world government or international law maintaining control over everyone. International borders are relatively stable due to mutually assured destruction and interlocking peace agreements. That's fine at that scale but I think it would be a terrible structure for a neighborhood where borders are measured in feet. Just look at all the international turmoil we have compared to the relative peace on your street.
submitted by williamfrantz to Minarchy [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 goodmusicisgood The first colander pour I didn't scrape off before it dried! 12x12"

The first colander pour I didn't scrape off before it dried! 12x12 submitted by goodmusicisgood to AcrylicPouring [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 almost-punk at least this was *my* thought process...

at least this was *my* thought process... submitted by almost-punk to GMEJungle [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 ChasingFlavors Made a little doodle while discords down

Made a little doodle while discords down submitted by ChasingFlavors to ScreamingTreeFamily [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 Its-vee student awards

To anyone that has applied for student awards/ or has received it. How detailed do the answers need to be for essay questions ? do the details matter on whether you will receive or not ?
submitted by Its-vee to georgebrowncollege [link] [comments]


2022.01.26 17:22 ipadconsoledevice On my way to roark and his... LAND, no rocks shall stand in my way with lancer around, but he hasn't evolved yet

submitted by ipadconsoledevice to TeamSky [link] [comments]


http://kamenskkprf.ru